Armstrong 7: Correspondence

CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,

Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF TOE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

COUNTY OF MARIN,

Respondent,

GERALD ARMSTRONG,

Real Party in Interest,

A107095

M an n Con nty No. 15768 D, 021632

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v,

GERALD ARMSTRONG,

Defendant and Respondent.

A107100

Marin County No. CV021632

Dear Counsel:

The judicial panel, which will decide this appeal, consists of (in alphabetical

order):

Munter, J. (assigned judge)

Rivera, J. and
Sepulveda, J.

As indicated. Justice Sepulveda is a member of the judicial panel that will decide
this appeal, but Justice Sepulveda will not be present at the scheduled oral argument
hearing. However, the argument will be recorded on audio disc. Pursuant to Article VI,
section 3 of the California Constitution, the concurrence of two justices present at the
argument is necessary for a judgment

The parties arc directed to notify this court in writing TO HE RECEIVED at the
Clerk’s Office before 5:00 p.ni. ? Thursday, September 2005 (fax is acceptable in this
limited instance; fax number is 415/865-7300, Attn: Tnes Onlanoc, Deputy'Clerk) if they

do not choose lo waive any rigid they may have to argue before the fulI panel, See Moles
v. Regents of University of California (1982) 32 CJd 867,

If an objection is not timely received, the argument will proceed with two justices
present and the appeal will be decided after Justice Sepulveda has the opportunity to
review the tape recording and deliberate with the other members of the panel.

dale: August 31, 2005

Laurence D. Kay
Presiding Justice